Monday, 15 March 2010

Ahh this is lovely











Nine Green Bottles: 'Giorgio Morandi, 1890-1964'
Morandi was 'a man intent, not simply a painter of bottles… but a man intent on exploring subtle equations of forms, placing and atmospheric effects… separating their volumes and colour and then interlocking them again through an alchemy he alone understood.' It is not inappropriate today to compare him to Mark Rothko, another painter who created his own inner world that reflected all humanity and its tragedy, and communicated it for all time.

Of course, to understand better about Morandi, it is necessary to observe this condition, of a massive and obsessive repetition, by visiting the Morandi oeuvre held and displayed en masse at the Morandi Museum in Bologna, his home town. Here, even more so than in New York, there is something about Morandi works en masse that chills the soul, no less. Morandi was a devotee of Cézanne, whose repeat paintings of Mont St Victoire never do seem to pall. Cézanne's 'Apples' can be read as fulfilling the whole world of emotions, running from the calmest stage of meditation to abjectly distraught feelings, or to the heights of pleasure and delight. In contrast, Morandi's still life paintings seem on occasion to be static and lifeless. One wonders why the early landscapes (for example, 'Landscape with Farm House in Distant Hills', 1929; or the earlier 'Landscape' of 1921, which pays and repays dividends to the observer with its subtle, enigmatic shadings of green; or 'Landscape with Pink Houses', 1925) - of such quality as masterly works - seem to have been pushed along the shelf of Morandi's oeuvre in comparison with the remorseless repetitiveness of the still life works of the middle period. The pristine 'Still Life' (1918) suggests a still young artist shaping up for fame in the realm of the modern masters. Was there then perhaps some psychiatric condition that gradually overwhelmed this emergent and precocious talent of the young modernist? So it seems.
The years of the Second World War found Morandi producing a notable output. There were close on 80 landscapes, and 130 or so still life works, from all of which the Metropolitan has selected a strong representation in its 100 or so exhibits. Clearly, Morandi was traumatised by the effects of war on his society, and perhaps this was, so to say, hidden in his personality rather than self-evident. The effects are more evident in his paintings, especially the still life works. Efforts to break out of any straightjacket are revealed in the tortured still life wartime works such 'Still Life' (1943). After the war, a new lyricism crept back into Morandi's work, expressed now through the still life works after 1945. Some of the old homage to Cézanne re-emerged in the domestic and village landscapes of the 1950s. The still life works of the 1957-60 period exhibit a new and magical tone of blue. Certainly, Morandi's inner turmoil was coming to reach a resolution through his paintings in the final decade. The landscapes after 1960 were his triumph.
It has been predictable that certain contemporary reviewers have sought to flush out a discrete sexuality in Morandi's standpoint. It is misleading to seek any such 'quivering' quality in the work of any period. Rather, there can be found a solid level of containment, which strengthened Morandi's creative and artistic consistency. This exhibition has now provided an opportunity to re-assess Morandi's particular and unique talent as a painter, of whom Italy can now at last be justly proud. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, has ably accomplished this revision. And given the financial turmoil affecting the citizens of New York right now, there could be nothing better than to step into the Morandi exhibition and selectively focus on, say five, works there, perhaps two landscapes and three still lifes. (A limited but effective de-stress palliative.)

rousseauesque







some inspiration




Martin Boyce


Now I've got real worry (Mask and L-bar) from 1998-9 is an example of an early work in this vein in which Boyce has deconstructed two modernist objects by the iconic American designers, Charles and Ray Eames. In works such as this, Boyce compares the culture in which the objects were originally produced, in this case the optimism surrounding the post-war boom in manufacturing, to their role today as design icons for the bourgeoisie. As Boyce explained: "It seemed to me that as these objects travelled through time their original ethos had been stripped away and replaced by an ideology based on pecuniary notions of taste and specialist knowledge".
Boyce's interest in modernist design was cemented when he unearthed a photograph of the concrete trees created by Joël and Jan Martel for the 1925 Parisian exhibition of decorative arts. This marks the defining point for the artist's more recent work. According to Boyce these trees "represent a perfect collapse of architecture and nature"; the amalgamation of the opposing elements of the urban and natural world. From the Martels' distinctly cubist inspired interpretation of nature, Boyce extracted a grid based vocabulary of geometric shapes that he has since used as a basis for all aspects of his practice. Once familiar with this visual code it becomes identifiable ubiquitously, in everything from his photographic and print-based work, to his sculptures and installations.

Photos of a genius











Thursday, 18 February 2010

Its the meaning stupid

Expression
Why it is usually a tautology
Why it may not be a tautology
"the reason why" or "the reason is because"
"reason" is already by definition a description of why something happens.
"Reason" implies a deeper insight into the cognitive cause for action. "Why did he cross the street there?" - "There was a crosswalk." vs. "What was the reason why..." subtly demands further explanation into the significance for the individual. Note: This use only pertains to cognitive (reasoning) entities.
"free gift"
"gift" is, by definition, something given without charge.
May be used to emphasize the fact that there is no hidden expectation of reciprocity.
"cheapest price"
"cheapest" means "lowest priced", thus "cheapest price" is actually "lowest priced price".Also it is almost a non-sense, as a price is not to be bought.
Using "cheapest" on its own may imply "low price, low quality", whereas "cheapest price" emphasizes that the sale price is the lowest without connotations of poor quality.
"first introduced"
"introduced" generally implies that it is the first time that someone or something has been presented.
A speaker may be introduced to different audiences on different occasions. It would be correct to refer to the first such occasion as being when that person was "first introduced".
"new innovation"
"innovation" is defined as something new.
In context, there might have been previous innovations.
"forward planning" or "planning ahead"
"planning" is always done in advance.
May be used to differentiate the usual planning from a different form of planning done well in advance. For example: "Besides planning this week's meeting in detail, we should also do some forward planning of next week's meeting."
"faster speed"
"faster" means "greater speed", thus "faster speed" is actually "greater speed speed".
"faster" may refer to either an absolute magnitude of speed (e.g. 90 km/h), or the time taken by an event. Mapping software is an example which allows for specification of preference.
"unsolved mystery"
"mystery" is something that is unexplained, unknown or unsolved.
This refers to other "solved mysteries", which are then not mysteries.
"added bonus"
"bonus" is an added extra, thus "added bonus" is actually "added added extra".
May be used when referring to an additional bonus. For example: "Buy two and receive a bonus pencil sharpener, buy five and receive an added bonus steak knife."
"over-exaggerate"
"exaggerate" means "overstate", thus "over-exaggerate" means "over overstate".
May be used to differentiate regular exaggeration from excessive exaggeration. For example: "Exaggerate the size of it a little bit if you like, but don't over-exaggerate it, otherwise you won't seem credible." Proper exaggeration would simply be emphasis, compared to overemphasis.
"short summary"
a "summary" is a "shortened" version of a text
May be used to differentiate a very short summary from one of average length.
In some phrases such as "I can see it with my own eyes" or "I made it with my own hands" the tautology is a rhetorical device that adds emphasis, as double negatives used to do. Expressions such as "all in all" or being able to "read and write" (to have literacy) are not strictly tautological and are instead referred to as siamese twins.

Words its all about meaning

Tautology may refer to:
Tautology (rhetoric), repetition of meaning, using different words to say the same thing twice, especially where the additional words fail to provide additional clarity when repeating a meaning.
Tautology (logic), a technical notion in formal logic, universal unconditioned truth, always valid

Joseph Kosuth



Joseph Kosuth in his 1969 essay, "Art after Philosophy," when he wrote: "All art (after Duchamp) is conceptual (in nature) because art only exists conceptually."